Skip to content

Choose what KAIDAN can access

Start with the alert or case you want to investigate. KAIDAN's Access for this investigation card shows routine monitoring separately from any extra access for that case. You do not need to expand Review details or enter Expert view to find it. Open KAIDAN from the selected item in Briard-AI to keep the alert or case navigation context. Sign-in and any required phone-code check still apply. KAIDAN checks your actual workspace, role, case, source, policy, and permissions; Briard-AI does not grant or copy case access.

The screenshots below show a fictional local candidate, not a live customer source. Source choices, requests, and approvals shown in this walkthrough were simulated in the browser; no provider ran and no person approved a real request.

Fictional local KAIDAN candidate: desktop access card shows routine metadata-only monitoring beside extra access for this case, with Request deeper investigation below.

Fictional local KAIDAN candidate: the same access card stacks routine monitoring and case-specific extra access on a narrow mobile screen.

What happens without an extra request?

Routine monitoring: Metadata only. KAIDAN records facts about approved events, such as time, source, tool, and outcome. It does not collect message or file contents through normal intake. You can keep monitoring without submitting anything. A case may separately have an approved, active, completed, failed, or unknown extra-access request; the routine-monitoring sentence is not the case's overall access status. Read the case's actual request history in KAIDAN. If status cannot be loaded, use Retry rather than assuming no extra access.

Two choices for a closer look

Choice shown in KAIDANWhat it can examineWhat may be kept for this case
Analyze and keep findings (Private analysis)Approved content inside your environment, within the case and source limitsFindings and receipts, not the original content as case evidence
Collect selected evidence (Case forensics)Only approved items for this case, within the case and source limitsApproved originals in a protected customer quarantine. Keeping exact files in an evidence vault requires a separate later decision and vault controls

These labels describe case retention, not every temporary processing step or copies still held by the original source. A case-forensics request has a policy maximum retention; exact vault retention is a separate later promotion decision. Neither choice deletes existing evidence, enables an unconfigured source, or proves provider collection is ready. Normal event intake remains metadata-only. Extra access requires a linked case, an eligible approved source, an active privacy policy, a bounded purpose and scope, and the existing authorization controls.

Fictional local candidate, screen 1: Analyze and keep findings and Collect selected evidence appear side by side; neither is selected.

The three request screens

  1. Choose the check. Open Request deeper investigation on the access card. Compare both choices before selecting one. Keep metadata only leaves without sending a request. Opening, cancelling, or leaving a draft grants no access.
  2. Tell us what to check. Confirm the linked case and friendly source name. Explain why this case needs the check. Review the proposed material, time range, item and size limits, and required storage or retention. KAIDAN may fill known facts and narrow limits from trusted records, but it must not invent a purpose, permission, source, policy, or readiness. An authorized person must resolve anything missing.
  3. Review and send. Read the exact proposed case, tool, source, material, limits, purpose, expiry, retention and handling, and who may approve. Keep the least-evidence confirmation. A broader scope needs its required reason. Technical details shows exact identifiers and policy versions without hiding a required privacy or retention decision. Send for approval creates a request; it does not start collection.

Fictional local candidate, screen 2: a simulated named source is selected while the required case-specific purpose is still blank.

Fictional local candidate, screen 2: the requester has entered a case-specific purpose before reviewing the request.

Seeded fictional browser-test candidate, screen 3: review shows the case, named source, time and item limits, retention, purpose, expiry, and two-reviewer requirement before submission.

This capture shows a proposed request, not an approval or a provider collection.

The request and decision history stays in KAIDAN. Two distinct eligible people other than the requester must approve before extra access can be authorized. Reviewers see the same plain summary and the exact underlying restrictions. They record their decisions and reasons in KAIDAN; Briard-AI does not approve on their behalf.

Expert controls can still accept a legacy customer-side connector ID when no named source choice is available. Manual entry is not source verification, activation, or permission; the bounded request still needs the same review and approvals. The ordinary guided path uses friendly names from configured choices and does not ask a requester to type a connector, encryption-key, or region ID when approved configuration already supplies it.

Read the actual state, not a reassuring guess

KAIDAN stateWhat it means
Waiting for approval — 0 of 2 / 1 of 2The request has not started collection.
Approved — collection has not startedBoth approvals exist; this alone is not evidence that a source ran.
Investigation in progressSupported by the actual collection state.
Some evidence receivedCollection is partial; inspect what remains missing.
Request completedInspect receipts, findings, and actual handling outcomes. Completion does not mean the incident is fixed.
Denied, expired, or failedRead the reason and permitted next action. Expiry does not mean previously collected evidence was deleted.
Access status unavailableRetry. Do not infer that access is off or on.

Several requests may exist for one case. Read all of them in KAIDAN's authoritative request history rather than relying on one badge. A response request being sent is a separate event and does not prove remediation or independent verification.

Fictional browser simulation: the saved case request is waiting for approval at zero of two, and collection has not started.

Fictional browser simulation: two simulated distinct approvals authorize the saved scope, but collection has not started.

If you cannot continue

What is missingSafe next step
No linked caseUse KAIDAN's authorized Create a case to continue path; do not create a case silently.
Your role cannot request or reviewUse the displayed authorized help path. Do not borrow another account or bypass sign-in.
Source, privacy policy, storage, or retention is not readyAn authorized administrator or operator completes the customer-managed KAIDAN setup or deployment binding, with case context preserved. Do not invent a source or default a required decision to “none.”
Sign-in is oldComplete the existing sign-in or phone-code check. The selected navigation context may resume, but KAIDAN rechecks tenant, role, case, and source.
Request expired, denied, partial, or failedRead the actual history and the allowed next action. Do not treat expiry as evidence deletion, or a partial result as a completed collection.

There is no implied Stop access or Delete evidence shortcut. Those actions require separate backend authorization, collection, retention, and legal-hold controls. Do not put raw prompts, model replies, customer files, credentials, or secrets in a support message or ordinary case comment.

For the broader alert workflow, see Alerts and real-time response. For security controls, see Security and data boundaries. For access problems, see Troubleshooting. For product help, contact support@briard-ai.app with safe record identifiers and timestamps only.

Briard-AI and KAIDAN are products of Unfettered Minds LLC. Governance documentation and review support. Not legal advice or certification.